Which Class Of Animal Has A Madreporite?
Crinoids Temporal range: | |
---|---|
Crinoid on the reef of Batu Moncho Island, Indonesia | |
Scientific classification | |
Kingdom: | Animalia |
Phylum: | Echinodermata |
Subphylum: | Crinozoa |
Course: | Crinoidea Miller, 1821[2] |
Subclasses | |
Articulata (540 species) |
Crinoids are marine animals that make up the course Crinoidea, 1 of the classes of the phylum Echinodermata, which also includes the starfish, breakable stars, sea urchins and sea cucumbers.[3] Those crinoids which, in their developed form, are fastened to the bounding main bottom by a stalk are commonly called sea lilies, while the unstalked forms are chosen feather stars or comatulids, existence members of the largest crinoid order, Comatulida.
Adult crinoids are characterised by having the mouth located on the upper surface. This is surrounded past feeding arms, and is linked to a U-shaped gut, with the anus being located on the oral disc near the mouth. Although the basic echinoderm pattern of fivefold symmetry tin be recognised, in most crinoids the five arms are subdivided into ten or more. These have feathery pinnules and are spread wide to gather planktonic particles from the water. At some stage in their lives, most crinoids have a stem used to attach themselves to the substrate, but many alive fastened only every bit juveniles and become free-swimming as adults.
There are only about 600 living species of crinoid,[four] but the form was much more arable and various in the by. Some thick limestone beds dating to the mid-Paleozoic to Jurassic eras are almost entirely fabricated upwardly of disarticulated crinoid fragments.[v] [6] [7]
Etymology [edit]
The name "Crinoidea" comes from the Ancient Greek give-and-take κρίνον (krínon), "a lily", with the suffix –oid meaning "like".[8] [9] They live in both shallow water[10] and in depths as great equally 9,000 meters (30,000 ft).[11] Those crinoids which in their adult form are attached to the sea bottom past a stem are commonly called sea lilies,[12] while the unstalked forms are called feather stars[13] or comatulids, beingness members of the largest crinoid society, Comatulida.[xiv]
Morphology [edit]
The bones body form of a crinoid is a stem (not present in adult feather stars) and a crown consisting of a loving cup-like central trunk known equally the theca, and a set of 5 rays or arms, usually branched and feathery. The mouth and anus are both located on the upper side of the theca, making the dorsal (upper) surface the oral surface, unlike in the other echinoderm groups such as the sea urchins, starfish and brittle stars where the mouth is on the underside.[15] The numerous calcareous plates make upwards the bulk of the crinoid, with only a small percentage of soft tissue. These ossicles fossilise well and there are beds of limestone dating from the Lower Carboniferous effectually Clitheroe, England, formed almost exclusively from a various fauna of crinoid fossils.[16]
The stalk of bounding main lilies is composed of a column of highly porous ossicles which are connected by ligamentary tissue. It attaches to the substrate with a flattened holdfast or with whorls of jointed, root-like structures known as cirri. Farther cirri may occur higher up the stem. In crinoids that attach to difficult surfaces, the cirri may be robust and curved, resembling birds' anxiety, merely when crinoids alive on soft sediment, the cirri may be slender and rod-like. Juvenile feather stars have a stalk, but this is subsequently lost, with many species retaining a few cirri at the base of operations of the crown. The bulk of living crinoids are free-swimming and have only a vestigial stalk. In those abyssal species that yet retain a stalk, it may reach up to 1 m (three ft) in length (although usually much smaller), and fossil species are known with 20 m (66 ft) stems,[17] the largest recorded crinoid having a stalk 40 grand (130 ft) in length.[18]
The theca is pentamerous (has 5-role symmetry) and is homologous with the trunk or disc of other echinoderms. The base of operations of the theca is formed from a cup-shaped set of ossicles (bony plates), the calyx, while the upper surface is formed by the weakly-calcified tegmen, a membranous disc. The tegmen is divided into 5 "ambulacral areas", including a deep groove from which the tube anxiety projection, and five "interambulacral areas" between them. The oral fissure is near the middle or on the margin of the tegmen, and ambulacral grooves lead from the base of operations of the arms to the mouth. The anus is also located on the tegmen, often on a small-scale elevated cone, in an interambulacral area. The theca is relatively small and contains the crinoid's digestive organs.[17]
The arms are supported by a serial of articulating ossicles similar to those in the stalk. Primitively, crinoids had just five arms, merely in most modernistic forms these are divided into 2 at ossicle II, giving ten arms in total. In almost living species, especially the gratis-swimming plumage stars, the arms co-operative several more times, producing up to two hundred branches in total. Being jointed, the arms can curl up. They are lined, on either side alternately, by smaller jointed appendages known as "pinnules" which give them their plume-like appearance. Both arms and pinnules take tube feet along the margins of the ambulacral grooves. The tube feet come in groups of three of different size; they have no suction pads and are used to concord and manipulate food particles. The grooves are equipped with cilia which facilitate feeding past moving the organic particles along the arm and into the mouth.[17]
-
Stem, theca and arms of a "true" (stalked) crinoid (family Isselicrinidae)
-
-
Tegmen of a Lamprometra palmata. The oral fissure is located at the eye of the v feeding grooves, and the anus at the top of the column.
-
Shut-up on the cirri that allow comatulids to walk and attach themselves
Biology [edit]
Feeding [edit]
Crinoids are passive suspension feeders, filtering plankton and small particles of detritus from the sea water flowing past them with their feather-like arms. The arms are raised to form a fan-shape which is held perpendicular to the electric current. Mobile crinoids move to perch on rocks, coral heads or other eminences to maximise their feeding opportunities. The food particles are caught by the primary (longest) tube feet, which are fully extended and held erect from the pinnules, forming a food-trapping mesh, while the secondary and third tube feet are involved in manipulating annihilation encountered.[17]
The tube feet are covered with sticky mucus that traps any particles which come up in contact. Once they have caught a particle of food, the tube feet flick it into the ambulacral groove, where the cilia propel the mucus and food particles towards the mouth. Lappets at the side of the groove help continue the mucus stream in place. The total length of the nutrient-trapping surface may be very large; the 56 arms of a Japanese sea lily with 24 cm (9 in) arms, have a total length of 80 grand (260 ft) including the pinnules. Generally speaking, crinoids living in environments with relatively little plankton have longer and more highly branched arms than those living in food-rich environments.[17]
The mouth descends into a short oesophagus. There is no truthful breadbasket, and then the oesophagus connects direct to the intestine, which runs in a unmarried loop right around the inside of the calyx. The intestine oftentimes includes numerous diverticulae, some of which may be long or branched. The end of the intestine opens into a short muscular rectum. This ascends towards the anus, which projects from a small conical protuberance at the edge of the tegmen. Faecal matter is formed into large, mucous-cemented pellets which fall onto the tegmen and thence the substrate.[17]
Predation [edit]
Specimens of the bounding main urchin Calocidaris micans found in the vicinity of the crinoid Endoxocrinus parrae, have been shown to contain large quantities of stalk portions in their guts. These consist of articulated ossicles with soft tissue, whereas the local sediment contained only disarticulated ossicles without soft tissue. This makes it highly likely that these sea urchins are predators of the crinoids, and that the crinoids flee, offering office of their stalk in the procedure.[nineteen]
Diverse crinoid fossils hint at possible prehistoric predators. Coprolites of both fish and cephalopods take been found containing ossicles of diverse crinoids, such as the pelagic crinoid Saccocoma, from the Jurassic lagerstatten Solnhofen,[xx] while damaged crinoid stems with bite marks matching the toothplates of coccosteid placoderms accept been found in Belatedly Devonian Poland.[21] The calyxes of several Devonian to Carboniferous-aged crinoids have the shells of a snail, Platyceras, intimately associated with them.[22] Some have the snail situated over the anus, suggesting that Platyceras was a coprophagous commensal, while others have the animal direct situated over a borehole, suggesting a more than pernicious relationship.[23]
H2o vascular system [edit]
Like other echinoderms, crinoids possess a h2o vascular system that maintains hydraulic pressure in the tube feet. This is non connected to external sea h2o via a madreporite, as in other echinoderms, only but continued through a large number of pores to the coelom (body cavity). The primary fluid reservoir is the muscular-walled ring canal which is connected to the coelom by rock canals lined with calcareous cloth. The coelom is divided into a number of interconnecting spaces by mesenteries. It surrounds the viscera in the disc and has branches within the stalk and artillery, with smaller branches extending into the pinnules. It is the contraction of the ring culvert that extends the tube feet. Three narrow branches of the coelom enter each arm, two on the oral side and 1 aborally, and pinnules. The action of cilia cause at that place to be a slow flow of fluid (1mm per second) in these canals, outward in the oral branches and in in the aboral ones, and this is the principal ways of transport of nutrients and waste products. There is no centre and split circulatory system just at the base of the disc there is a large blood vessel known as the centric organ, containing some slender blind-ended tubes of unknown function, which extends into the stalk.[17]
These various fluid-filled spaces, in addition to transporting nutrients effectually the body, also function as both a respiratory and an excretory organization. Oxygen is absorbed primarily through the tube feet, which are the most sparse-walled parts of the torso, with further gas exchange taking identify over the large surface area of the arms. There are no specialised organs for excretion while waste product is collected past phagocytic coelomocytes.[17]
Nervous organization [edit]
The crinoid nervous system is divided into iii parts, with numerous connections betwixt them. The oral or uppermost portion is the but 1 homologous with the nervous systems of other echinoderms. It consists of a cardinal nerve ring surrounding the oral cavity, and radial nerves branching into the arms and is sensory in function. Below this lies an intermediate nervus ring, giving off radial nerves supplying the arms and pinnules. These fretfulness are motor in nature, and control the musculature of the tube anxiety. The third portion of the nervous system lies aborally, and is responsible for the flexing and movement deportment of the arms, pinnules and cirri. This is centred on a mass of neural tissue near the base of the calyx, and provides a single nerve to each arm and a number of nerves to the stem.[17]
Reproduction and life bicycle [edit]
Crinoids are not capable of clonal reproduction every bit are some starfish and brittle stars, but are capable of regenerating lost trunk parts. Arms torn off by predators or damaged by adverse environmental weather tin can regrow, and even the visceral mass tin can regenerate over the course of a few weeks. This regeneration may be vital in surviving attacks by predatory fish.[17]
Crinoids are dioecious, with individuals being either male or female. In most species, the gonads are located in the pinnules but in a few, they are located in the artillery. Not all the pinnules are reproductive, just those closest to the crown. The gametes are produced in genital canals enclosed in genital coeloms. The pinnules eventually rupture to release the sperm and eggs into the surrounding bounding main water. In certain genera, such as Antedon, the fertilised eggs are cemented to the arms with secretions from epidermal glands; in others, especially common cold water species from Antarctica, the eggs are brooded in specialised sacs on the arms or pinnules.[17]
The fertilised eggs hatch to release free-pond vitellaria larvae. The bilaterally symmetrical larva is barrel-shaped with rings of cilia running round the trunk, and a tuft of sensory hairs at the upper pole. While both feeding (planktotrophic) and non-feeding (lecithotrophic) larvae be among the iv other extant echinoderm classes, all nowadays solar day crinoids appear to be descendants from a surviving clade that went through a clogging after the Permian extinction, at that fourth dimension losing the feeding larval stage.[24] The larva's free-swimming period lasts for but a few days before it settles on the bottom and attaches itself to the underlying surface using an adhesive gland on its underside. The larva then undergoes an extended menstruation of metamorphoses into a stalked juvenile, becoming radially symmetric in the process. Even the free-swimming feather stars go through this phase, with the developed eventually breaking away from the stalk.[17]
Locomotion [edit]
Most modern crinoids, i.east., the feather stars, are gratis-moving and lack a stem as adults. Examples of fossil crinoids that have been interpreted as gratis-pond include Marsupites, Saccocoma and Uintacrinus.[25] In general, crinoids motility to new locations past crawling, using the cirri as legs. Such a movement may be induced in relation to a modify in current direction, the need to climb to an elevated perch to feed, or considering of an agonistic behaviour past an encountered individual.[26] Crinoids can likewise swim. They do this past co-ordinated, repeated sequential movements of the arms in three groups. At kickoff the direction of travel is upwards merely soon becomes horizontal, travelling at nearly vii cm (2.viii in) per second with the oral surface in front end. Swimming usually takes place equally curt bursts of activity lasting up to half a minute, and in the comatulid Florometra serratissima at least, only takes place after mechanical stimulation or as an escape response evoked by a predator.[26]
In 2005, a stalked crinoid was recorded pulling itself along the sea flooring off the Grand Bahama Island. While it has been known that stalked crinoids could move, before this recording the fastest motion known for a stalked crinoid was 0.half dozen metres (2 anxiety) per hr. The 2005 recording showed one of these moving across the seabed at the much faster rate of 4 to 5 cm (i.vi to 2.0 in) per second, or 144 to 180 m (472 to 591 ft) per hour.[27]
Evolution [edit]
Origins [edit]
If i ignores the enigmatic Echmatocrinus of the Burgess Shale, the earliest known unequivocal crinoid groups date back to the Ordovician, 480 meg years agone. In that location are two competing hypotheses pertaining to the origin of the group: the traditional viewpoint holds that crinoids evolved from inside the blastozoans (the eocrinoids and their derived descendants, the blastoids and the cystoids), whereas the nearly popular culling suggests that the crinoids split early from among the edrioasteroids.[28] The debate is difficult to settle, in part because all three candidate ancestors share many characteristics, including radial symmetry, calcareous plates, and stalked or direct attachment to the substrate.[28]
Diversity [edit]
Echinoderms with mineralized skeletons entered the fossil tape in the early on Cambrian (540 mya), and during the side by side 100 million years, the crinoids and blastoids (too stalked filter-feeders) were dominant.[29] At that time, the Echinodermata included twenty taxa of class rank, only five of which survived the mass extinction events that followed. The long and varied geological history of the crinoids demonstrates how well the echinoderms had adapted to filter-feeding.[3]
The crinoids underwent 2 periods of precipitous adaptive radiation, the first during the Ordovician (485 to 444 mya), and the other during the early Triassic (around 230 mya).[30] This Triassic radiations resulted in forms possessing flexible arms becoming widespread; motility, predominantly a response to predation pressure level, also became far more prevalent than sessility.[31] This radiations occurred somewhat earlier than the Mesozoic marine revolution, possibly because it was mainly prompted past increases in benthic predation, specifically of echinoids.[32] There and then followed a selective mass extinction at the end of the Permian menstruation, during which all blastoids and most crinoids became extinct.[30] After the terminate-Permian extinction, crinoids never regained the morphological diversity and dominant position they enjoyed in the Paleozoic; they employed a different suite of ecological strategies open to them from those that had proven so successful in the Paleozoic.[30]
Fossils [edit]
Some fossil crinoids, such equally Pentacrinites, seem to take lived attached to floating driftwood and complete colonies are oftentimes establish. Sometimes this driftwood would become waterlogged and sink to the lesser, taking the fastened crinoids with information technology. The stem of Pentacrinites can be several metres long. Modern relatives of Pentacrinites live in gentle currents fastened to rocks by the finish of their stem. The largest fossil crinoid on record had a stalk 40 m (130 ft) in length.[33]
In 2012, 3 geologists reported they had isolated complex organic molecules from 340-one thousand thousand-yr-onetime (Mississippian) fossils of multiple species of crinoids. Identified every bit "resembl[ing ...] aromatic or polyaromatic quinones", these are the oldest molecules to exist definitively associated with detail private fossils, as they are believed to have been sealed inside ossicle pores by precipitated calcite during the fossilization process.[34]
Crinoid fossils, and in particular disarticulated crinoid columnals, can be so arable that they at times serve as the primary supporting clasts in sedimentary rocks.[ citation needed ] Rocks of this nature are chosen encrinites.
Taxonomy [edit]
Crinoidea has been accepted equally a distinct clade of echinoderms since the definition of the group past Miller in 1821.[35] According to the Earth Register of Marine Species, Articulata, the but extant subclass of Crinoidea, includes the following families:-[36]
- order Comatulida Clark, 1908
- super-family Antedonoidea Norman, 1865
- family Antedonidae Norman, 1865
- family unit Pentametrocrinidae AH Clark, 1908
- family Zenometridae AH Clark, 1909
- super-family Atelecrinoidea Bather, 1899
- family Atelecrinidae Bather, 1899
- super-family Comatuloidea Fleming, 1828
- family unit Comatulidae Fleming, 1828
- super-family Himerometroidea AH Clark, 1908
- family Colobometridae AH Clark, 1909
- family Eudiocrinidae AH Clark, 1907
- family unit Himerometridae AH Clark, 1907
- family Mariametridae AH Clark, 1909
- family unit Zygometridae AH Clark, 1908
- super-family Notocrinoidea Mortensen, 1918
- family Aporometridae HL Clark, 1938
- family Notocrinidae Mortensen, 1918
- super-family Paracomatuloidea Hess, 1951 †
- super-family Tropiometroidea AH Clark, 1908
- family Asterometridae Gislén, 1924
- family Calometridae AH Clark, 1911
- family Charitometridae AH Clark, 1909
- family Ptilometridae AH Clark, 1914
- family Thalassometridae AH Clark, 1908
- family Tropiometridae AH Clark, 1908
- Comatulida incertae sedis
- family Atopocrinidae Messing, 2011 (in Hess & Messing, 2011)
- family unit Bathycrinidae Bather, 1899
- family Bourgueticrinidae Loriol, 1882
- family Guillecrinidae Mironov & Sorokina, 1998
- family Phrynocrinidae AH Clark, 1907
- family Septocrinidae Mironov, 2000
- super-family Antedonoidea Norman, 1865
- order Cyrtocrinida
- Sub-order Cyrtocrinina
- family unit Sclerocrinidae Jaekel, 1918
- Sub-order Holopodina
- family Eudesicrinidae Bather, 1899
- family Holopodidae Zittel, 1879
- Sub-order Cyrtocrinina
- lodge Encrinida †
- order Hyocrinida
- family Hyocrinidae Carpenter, 1884
- gild Isocrinida
- Sub-club Isocrinina
- family Cainocrinidae Simms, 1988
- family Isocrinidae Gislén, 1924
- family Isselicrinidae Klikushkin, 1977
- family Proisocrinidae Rasmussen, 1978
- Sub-society Pentacrinitina †
- family Pentacrinitidae Greyness, 1842 †
- Sub-club Isocrinina
- order Millericrinida †
Phylogeny [edit]
The phylogeny, geologic history, and classification of the Crinoidea was discussed by Wright et al. (2017).[37] These authors presented new phylogeny-based and rank-based classifications based on results of recent phylogenetic analyses.[35] [38] [39] [40] Their rank-based classification of crinoid higher taxa (down to Club), not fully resolved and with numerous groups incertae sedis (of uncertain placement), is illustrated in the cladogram.
In civilization [edit]
Fossilised crinoid columnal segments extracted from limestone quarried on Lindisfarne, or found washed up along the foreshore, were threaded into necklaces or rosaries, and became known as St. Cuthbert'southward chaplet in the Middle Ages.[41] Similarly, in the Midwestern The states, fossilized segments of the columns of crinoids are sometimes known as Indian chaplet.[42] Crinoids are the country fossil of Missouri.[43]
Fossil crinoids [edit]
-
Fossil from Germany showing the stem, calyx, and artillery with pinnules
-
330 million yr old crinoid fossils from Iowa
-
-
Root-like crinoid holdfast from the Upper Ordovician, southern Ohio
-
Internal mold of crinoid stem lumen (and external mold of stem) from Lower Carboniferous, Ohio
References [edit]
- ^ Zamora, Samuel; Rahman, Imran A.; Ausich, William I. (2015). "Palaeogeographic implications of a new iocrinid crinoid (Disparida) from the Ordovician (Darriwillian) of Morocco". PeerJ. iii: e1450. doi:10.7717/peerj.1450. PMC4675106. PMID 26664800.
- ^ Hansson, Hans (2012). "Crinoidea". WoRMS. World Register of Marine Species. Retrieved 2013-01-30 .
- ^ a b Ruppert, Edward Eastward.; Fox, Richard, Due south.; Barnes, Robert D. (2004). Invertebrate Zoology, 7th edition. Cengage Learning. pp. 917–918. ISBN978-81-315-0104-vii.
- ^ "Animal Diversity Web: Crinoidea". University of Michigan Museum of Zoology. Retrieved 26 Baronial 2012.
- ^ Lucia, F. Jerry (1962). "Diagenesis of a Crinoidal Sediment". SEPM Periodical of Sedimentary Inquiry. 32: 848–865. doi:ten.1306/74D70D8F-2B21-11D7-8648000102C1865D.
- ^ Blyth Cain, J. D. (September 1968). "Aspects of the depositional surround and palaeoecology of crinoidal limestones". Scottish Journal of Geology. four (three): 191–208. doi:10.1144/sjg04030191. S2CID 219538295.
- ^ Jach, Renata (April 2005). "Storm-dominated degradation of the Lower Jurassic crinoidal limestones in the Krížna unit of measurement, Western Tatra Mountains, Poland". Facies. l (3–4): 561–572. doi:10.1007/s10347-004-0028-3. S2CID 128947091.
- ^ Webster's New Universal Entire Dictionary. 2nd ed. 1979.
- ^ "crinoid". Online Etymology Lexicon.
- ^ Zmarzly, D.L. (1985). "The Shallow-Water Crinoid Fauna of Kwajalein Atoll, Marshall Islands: Ecological Observations, Interatoll Comparisons, and Zoogeographic Affinities". Pacific Science. 39: 340–358. hdl:10125/941.
- ^ Oji, T.; Ogawa, Y.; Hunter, A. W. & Kitazawa, K. (2009). "Discovery of Dense Aggregations of Stalked Crinoids in Izu-Ogasawara Trench, Nihon". Zoological Science. 26 (6): 406–408. doi:10.2108/zsj.26.406. PMID 19583499. S2CID 5991969.
- ^ "Ocean lily". Encyclopædia Britannica . Retrieved xiv March 2011.
- ^ "Feather star". Encyclopædia Britannica . Retrieved fourteen March 2011.
- ^ Ausich, William I.; Messing, Charles G. "Crinoidea". Tree of Life. Retrieved xiv March 2011.
- ^ O'Hara, Timothy; Byrne, Maria (2017). Australian Echinoderms: Biology, Ecology and Development. Csiro Publishing. pp. 171–180. ISBN978-i-4863-0763-0.
- ^ Hess, Hans; Brett, Carlton E.; Ausich, William I.; Simms, Michael J. (2002). Fossil Crinoids. Cambridge University Press. pp. 3–5, 45–46. ISBN978-0-521-52440-7.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j m 50 Ruppert, Edward E.; Fox, Richard, S.; Barnes, Robert D. (2004). Invertebrate Zoology, seventh edition. Cengage Learning. pp. 917–927. ISBN978-81-315-0104-7.
- ^ Ponsonby, David; Dussart, George (2005). The Anatomy of the Sea. Vancouver: Raincoast Books. p. 129. ISBN978-0-8118-4633-2.
- ^ Baumiller, Tomasz K.; Mooi, Rich; Messing, Charles Thou. (2008). "Urchins in the meadow: Paleobiological and evolutionary implications of cidaroid predation on crinoids". Paleobiology. 34 (1): 22–34. doi:10.1666/07031.i. JSTOR 20445573. S2CID 85647638.
- ^ Hess, Hans (2003). "Upper Jurassic Solnhofen Plattenkalk of Bavaria, German". In Brett, Carlton Eastward.; Ausich, William I.; Simms, Michael J. (eds.). Fossil Crinoids. Cambridge Academy Press. pp. 216–24. ISBN978-0-521-52440-seven.
- ^ Gorzelak, Przemys Law; Rakowicz, Lukasz; Salamon, Mariusz A.; Szrek, Piotr (2011). "Inferred placoderm bite marks on Devonian crinoids from Poland". Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie - Abhandlungen. 259: 105–12. doi:10.1127/0077-7749/2010/0111.
- ^ Brett, Carlton E.; Walker, Sally E. (2002). "Predators and predation in Paleozoic marine environments" (PDF). Paleontological Society Papers. eight: 93–118. doi:10.1017/S1089332600001078. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-08-13. Retrieved 2014-04-06 .
- ^ Gahn, Wood J.; Baumiller, Tomasz K. (2003). "Infestation of Middle Devonian (Givetian) camerate crinoids by platyceratid gastropods and its implications for the nature of their biotic interaction" (PDF). Lethaia. 36 (2): 71–82. doi:10.1080/00241160310003072. hdl:2027.42/75509.
- ^ Raff, R A; Byrne, Grand (2006). "The agile evolutionary lives of echinoderm larvae". Heredity. 97 (3): 244–52. doi:10.1038/sj.hdy.6800866. PMID 16850040.
- ^ "About Crinoids". FossilEra. Retrieved 15 March 2019.
- ^ a b Shaw, K.D.; Fontaine, A.R. (2011). "The locomotion of the comatulid Florometra serratissima (Echinodermata: Crinoidea) and its adaptive significance". Canadian Journal of Zoology. 68 (5): 942–950. doi:10.1139/z90-135.
- ^ Baumiller, Tomasz Chiliad.; Messing, Charles G. (6 October 2005). "Crawling In Stalked Crinoids: In Situ Observations, Functional Morphology, and Implications for Paleozoic Taxa". Geological Club of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 37. p. 62. Archived from the original on seven April 2014. Retrieved half-dozen Apr 2014.
- ^ a b Guensburg, Thomas E.; Mooi, Rich; Sprinkle, James; David, Bruno; Lefebvre, Bertrand (2010). "Pelmatozoan arms from the mid-Cambrian of Australia: Bridging the gap between brachioles and brachials? Annotate: There is no bridge". Lethaia. 43 (3): 432–440. doi:10.1111/j.1502-3931.2010.00220.x.
- ^ Waggoner, Ben (16 Jan 1995). "Echinodermata: Fossil Record". Introduction to the Echinodermata. Museum of Paleontology: Academy of California at Berkeley. Retrieved 30 March 2019.
- ^ a b c Foote, Mike (1999). "Morphological diversity in the evolutionary radiation of Paleozoic and post-Paleozoic crinoids". Paleobiology. 25 (sp1): one–116. doi:10.1666/0094-8373(1999)25[1:MDITER]2.0.CO;2. ISSN 0094-8373. JSTOR 2666042. S2CID 85586709.
- ^ Baumiller, Tomasz One thousand. (2008). "Crinoid Ecological Morphology". Almanac Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences. 36: 221–249. Bibcode:2008AREPS..36..221B. doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.36.031207.124116.
- ^ Baumiller, T. K.; Salamon, M. A.; Gorzelak, P.; Mooi, R.; Messing, C. G.; Gahn, F. J. (2010). "Post-Paleozoic crinoid radiation in response to benthic predation preceded the Mesozoic marine revolution". Proceedings of the National University of Sciences. 107 (13): 5893–5896. Bibcode:2010PNAS..107.5893B. doi:ten.1073/pnas.0914199107. JSTOR 25665085. PMC2851891. PMID 20231453. INIST:22572914.
- ^ Ponsonby, David; Dussart, George (2005). The Anatomy of the Sea. Vancouver: Raincoast Books. p. 129. ISBN978-0-8118-4633-2.
- ^ O'Malley, C. E.; Ausich, Due west. I.; Chin, Y.-P. (2013). "Isolation and characterization of the earliest taxon-specific organic molecules (Mississippian, Crinoidea)". Geology. 41 (3): 347. Bibcode:2013Geo....41..347O. doi:10.1130/G33792.one. Note that the first sentence of the phys.org article contradicts the newspaper itself, which reviews several isolations of molecules from item fossils over the past decade.
- Pam Frost Gorder (February xix, 2013). "Aboriginal fossilized sea creatures yield oldest biomolecules isolated directly from a fossil". Phys.org.
- ^ a b Ausich, William I.; Kammer, Thomas W.; Rhenberg, Elizabeth C.; Wright, David F. (2015). "Early phylogeny of crinoids within the pelmatozoan clade". Palaeontology. 58 (6): 937–952. doi:10.1111/pala.12204.
- ^ Messing, Charles (2007). "Articulata". WoRMS. World Register of Marine Species. Retrieved 31 March 2019.
- ^ Wright, David F.; Ausich, William I.; Cole, Selina R.; Peter, Mark Eastward.; Rhenberg, Elizabeth C. (2017). "Phylogenetic taxonomy and classification of the Crinoidea (Echinodermata)". Journal of Paleontology. in press (4): 829–846. doi:10.1017/jpa.2016.142.
- ^ Wright, David F. (2017). "Bayesian estimation of fossil phylogenies and the development of early to middle Paleozoic crinoids (Echinodermata)". Periodical of Paleontology. 91 (4): 799–814. doi:10.1017/jpa.2016.141.
- ^ Cole, Selina R. (2017). "Phylogeny and morphologic evolution of the Ordovician Camerata (Course Crinoidea, Phylum Echinodermata)". Journal of Paleontology. 91 (4): 815–828. doi:10.1017/jpa.2016.137.
- ^ Rouse, Greg W.; Jermiin, Lars Due south.; Wilson, Nerida G.; Eeckhaut, Igor; Lanterbecq, Deborah; Oji, Tatsuo; Young, Craig Thousand.; Browning, Teena; Cisternas, Paula; Helgen, Lauren East.; Stuckey, Michelle; Messing, Charles G. (2013). "Stock-still, complimentary, and fixed: the fickle phylogeny of extant Crinoidea (Echinodermata) and their Permian-Triassic origin". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 66 (6): 161–181. doi:ten.1016/j.ympev.2012.09.018. PMID 23063883.
- ^ Lane, N. Gary; Ausich, William I. (2001). "The Fable of St Cuthbert's Chaplet: A Palaeontological and Geological Perspective". Sociology. 112 (1): 65–73. JSTOR 1260865.
- ^ "Identifying Unknown Fossils (by their shape)". Kentucky Geological Survey / University of Kentucky. Retrieved 21 June 2009.
- ^ "Missouri'southward Land Fossil". Office of the Secretary of State, Missouri. Retrieved 31 March 2019.
External links [edit]
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crinoid
Posted by: smithalitill.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Which Class Of Animal Has A Madreporite?"
Post a Comment