Which Is The Only Animal Group To Use Mediators In Conflict Resolution?
periodical article
Annual Review of Anthropology
, pp. 21-44 (24 pages)
Published By: Almanac Reviews
https://www. jstor .org/stable/4132870
With a personal account, you tin read up to 100 articles each calendar month for free.
Already take an account?
Purchase a PDF
How does it work?
- Select the buy option.
- Check out using a credit card or bank business relationship with
PayPal . - Read your article online and download the PDF from your email or your business relationship.
Sociality is favored by natural selection because it enhances grouping members' access to valued resources or reduces their vulnerability to predators, but group living too generates disharmonize among group members. To relish the benefits of sociality, group living animals must somehow overcome the costs of conflict. Non-homo primates take developed an constructive mechanism for resolving conflicts: They participate in peaceful postconflict (PC) reunions with sometime opponents. These peaceful PC interactions are collectively labeled reconciliation. At that place is a broad consensus that peaceful contacts amongst former opponents relieve stressful effects of conflict and allow former opponents to interact peacefully. Primates may reconcile to obtain short-term objectives, such as access to desirable resources. Alternatively, reconciliation may preserve valuable relationships damaged by conflict. Some researchers view these explanations as complementary, but they generate different predictions about the patterning of reconciliation that can be partially tested with available data. There are skilful reasons to question the validity of the human relationship-repair model, only it remains firmly entrenched in the reconciliation literature, perhaps because information technology fits our own folk model of how and why nosotros resolve conflicts ourselves. It is possible that the function of reconciliation varies inside the primate order, much every bit other aspects of cognitive abilities practice.
The Almanac Review of Anthropology®, in publication since 1972, covers significant developments in the subfields of Anthropology, including Archaeology, Biological Anthropology, Linguistics and Communicative Practices, Regional Studies and International Anthropology, and Sociocultural Anthropology. The journal is essential reading for anthropologists, ethnologists, archaeologists, linguists, and scientists in related fields.
Annual Reviews was founded in 1932 as a nonprofit scientific publisher to assist scientists cope with the ever-increasing volume of scientific enquiry. Comprehensive, authoritative, and disquisitional reviews written by the earth's leading scientists are now published in twenty-six disciplines in the biological, physical, and social sciences. According to the "Touch on Gene" rankings of the Institute for Scientific Information'south Science Citation Alphabetize, each Annual Review ranks at or well-nigh the tiptop of its respective field of study category. A searchable championship and author database and a collection of abstracts may exist constitute at https://www.annualreviews.org//. The web site too provides information and pricing for all printed volumes, online publications, and reprint collections.
This item is part of a JSTOR Drove.
For terms and use, please refer to our
Annual Review of Anthropology © 2002 Annual Reviews
Source: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4132870
Posted by: smithalitill.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Which Is The Only Animal Group To Use Mediators In Conflict Resolution?"
Post a Comment